This figure shows where each research line of the programme currently stands — its programmatic premise, the formalisation work, the evidence behind it, and how it reaches interpretation and application. It is a map of the work, not a single theorem chain.
Global map of the research programme. Four interconnected research lines unfold from a shared research motivation; not every theorem follows directly from the starting point.
The four layers
Layer 1Research starting pointA programmatic premise — the core of self-consciousness as identifying, representing and maintaining the self / non-self boundary. This is not a Lean theorem.
Layer 2Four formalisation linesA | Boundary potential (value layer); B | Boundary–self-report (conditional identity); C | Level self-reference (a specified selector); D | Assembly at the closure face.
Layer 3EvidenceEach line's theorem, counterexample, or unfinished item: Lean proofs, numerical cross-checks, the Level 2 toy machine, and open construction problems.
Layer 4Interpretation and applicationKant companion reading, engineering direction, and empirical direction — philosophical or engineering / empirical proposals, not conclusions derived automatically from the theorems.
What the arrows mean
Style
Meaning
Solid
Evidence chain of the corresponding research line.
Dashed
Research motivation / conceptual link — not a mathematical derivation.
Dotted
Interpretation or application direction.
Status note
This map describes the state as of 2026-10-19. Counts for the unified repository and the archival status of the Level 2 machine follow each fixed version and its release record.